AI exports from ArcMap can define colors in CMYK or RGB values. However, the Adobe Illustrator file format that ArcMap writes does not support font embedding, so users that do not have the Esri fonts installed may not be able to view AI files with the proper symbology.
The ArcMap AI format preserves most layers from the ArcMap table of contents.
EPS exports from ArcMap can define colors in CMYK or RGB values.ĪI files are an excellent format for postprocessing in Adobe Illustrator as well as an interchange format for publishing. EPS files exported from ArcMap support embedding of fonts so that users who do not have Esri fonts installed can still view the proper symbology. EPS files can be edited in many drawing applications or placed as a graphic in most page layout applications. PostScript is the publishing industry standard for high-end graphics files, cartography, and printing.
#ARCGIS PRO VS ARCMAP WINDOWS#
However, since EMF does not support font embedding and is exclusively a Windows format, it is not commonly used as an interchange format between users.ĮPS files use the PostScript page description language to describe vector and raster objects. They are useful for embedding in Windows documents because the vector portions of the EMF can be resized without loss of quality.
I feel like a guinea pig.EMF files are native Windows graphics files that can contain a mixture of vector and raster data.
#ARCGIS PRO VS ARCMAP FREE#
That's a perfect example of why upgrades should be free since they fix one thing and screw up another. Maybe it's just me but I followed the book step-by-step and I can't change the style of a DEM. Another thing I noticed is that in 2007, I could change the colors of a DEM and give it wide range of color ranges but I can't do it with 2008. How many topics are on here about fixing transparency in 2008? I guess it's going to be 2009 now. They should be giving out free upgrades since they fix some of the problems the last version should have had right anyway. I think there are some great things about this program, Autodesk just needs to make sure they work before they put the program out and charge for it. Then I have to find the duplicate and erase it using something other then autocad map because it won't even view it. I use it but it fails and then corrupts the shapefile and for some reason will duplicate one of the features. It's a really nice feature but I can't stand how unstable it is. I even like the way I can make a polyline and select it and make it a polygon feature on a shapefile. ArcGis has a command line but it's not as nice as autocads. I will agree with Tripp that it is easier to use the drawing tools with map. I am a planner and AutoCad user looking for a proper GIS program to analysis Wrote in message if this is the improper place to ask this question: Please visitįor more information including a schedule of upcoming Keck & Wood, Inc offers a range of GIS services and training. If you do more editing and 3D work Map would be your So based on my experience, if you do more analysis and less editing ArcGIS GIS functions any faster than ArcGIS as alot of it is conceptual. I don't believe your AutoCAD experience will allow you to learn Map's Though you are an AutoCAD user in either case you are going to have to learn Map also has built in 3D capability which ArcGIS does not have unless ArcGIS' editing tools are very clunky when compared to Map is much easier toĮdit spatial data in than ArcGIS. The exact opposite can be said for editing capability. Map also has a hard time with larger data sets and raster. While Map has analysis and thematic capability, theseįunction seem more of an after thought than an integrated part of the
ArcGIS was designed from the get go as anĪnalysis tool.